Skip to content

Free-speech protection could be fundamentally changed by Sarah Palin’s libel suit

People in this story

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin arrives at a federal court in Manhattan to resume a case against the New York Times after it was postponed because she tested positive for Covid-19 on February 03, 2022 in New York City.

Cardi B’s yearslong libel battle recently came to an end when a jury awarded the rap star $4 million in her suit against a celebrity gossip blogger. The case appears to be, at least anecdotally, emblematic of a rising number of famous people who feel that their reputations have taken a hit over something written about them. But none of those cases comes with the political heft of the one playing out this week in a Manhattan courtroom. On one side is former Alaska governor and Republican star Sarah Palin—a critic of the “lamestream media.” On the other is the oldest and one of the most widely read news organizations in the world, the 170-year-old New York Times.

In a broader sense, the Palin case could be a watershed moment for a Supreme Court ruling that has provided free-speech protection for newsrooms across America for nearly 60 years, New York Times v. Sullivan.

Continue reading at News@Northeastern.

More Stories

If Russia is developing some kind of space-based weapon, Putin may never get to use it. Here’s why.


Minority victims die more often, and at younger ages, from violence. New research explains why “people of color are doubly victimized”


Capital One and Discover merger may be a response to an adjacent concern: the Visa and Mastercard duopoly, economist says

Northeastern Global News