Skip to content
Connect
Stories

A new theory on long-​​term unemployment

Com­pa­nies rank more recently unem­ployed job can­di­dates much higher than they would rank oth­er­wise qual­i­fied appli­cants who have been out of work for more than six months, cre­ating an “unem­ploy­ment cliff” that puts the long-​​term unem­ployed at a severe dis­ad­van­tage in the job market.

The analysis is the result of a new paper that was penned by Rand Ghayad, a North­eastern Uni­ver­sity doc­toral stu­dent in eco­nomics, and pub­lished this month by the Fed­eral Reserve Bank of Boston.

Ghavad’s work focused on the Bev­eridge curve, which, up until 2009, showed that unem­ploy­ment decreased when job open­ings increased. But he found that the existing “one size fits all” eco­nomic analysis did not hold up when smaller sub­sets of the curve were ana­lyzed indi­vid­u­ally, such as a job candidate’s field of employ­ment or length of unemployment.

Those who had been out of work for more than six months had been faring sig­nif­i­cantly worse in finding a new job than those who had been unem­ployed for a brief period of time, according to Ghayad’s analysis.

“At the end of the 2007 reces­sion, vacan­cies started increasing without any change in unem­ploy­ment, which led many econ­o­mists to blame the slack in the labor market on ‘struc­tural fac­tors,’ meaning the people out of work were not qual­i­fied for the jobs that were avail­able,” Ghayad said.

But Ghayad and his doc­toral adviser William Dickens, Uni­ver­sity Dis­tin­guished Pro­fessor of Eco­nomics and Social Policy and the paper’s co-​​author, exam­ined the problem from a dif­ferent angle. They found that the long-​​term unem­ployed were qual­i­fied for jobs but were ranking lower than other poten­tial can­di­dates because of the length of time they had been out of the workforce.

Starting last spring, Ghayad sent out approx­i­mately 4,800 fic­ti­tious, computer-​​generated resumes that rep­re­sented appli­cants with iden­tical cre­den­tials except for unem­ploy­ment dura­tion and industry expe­ri­ence. He found that appli­cants who had been out of work for more than six months were almost never con­tacted for an inter­view. That, Ghayad explained, served as a proxy for whether a com­pany would even con­sider hiring an applicant.

The exper­i­ment also showed that appli­cants who had pre­vi­ously worked in the same industry as that of the hiring firm had a sig­nif­i­cant advan­tage over those who had worked in a dif­ferent industry, even one that closely related to the new posi­tion they were pursuing.

“It isn’t that firms aren’t finding the right workers,” Ghayad said, “but that employers are screening out the long-​​term unemployed.”

The bias against the long-​​term unem­ployed means that those who are newly out of work are able to recover more quickly from job loss, but also it sig­nals a long-​​term problem for the nation’s economy.

The Atlantic called the paper “pio­neering” and noted eco­nomics blogger Brad DeLong described the work as “a major empir­ical win” for Dickens and Ghayad. In his New York Times blog, Nobel Prize-​​winning econ­o­mist Paul Krugman wrote that Ghayad’s work high­lights “exactly the kind of thing we should fear, because it means that failure to address the slump is dam­aging the economy’s long-​​run prospects.”

Ghayad noted that this view on long-​​term unem­ploy­ment shows that the Fed­eral Reserve’s ongoing policy of quan­ti­ta­tive easing, which pumps cash into the economy at extremely low interest rates, is the best way to combat long-​​term unem­ploy­ment. With more access to cash, firms can hire more employees, including those long-​​overlooked unem­ployed applicants.

“With more jobs, you can move fur­ther back in the queue, hiring people who are still qual­i­fied but simply hadn’t been con­sid­ered before,” Ghayad said. “The con­tinued poor per­for­mance of the labor market is pri­marily attrib­ut­able to short­falls in the aggre­gate demand of labor. If we can create more job open­ings, we can allow the long-​​term unem­ployed to get back to work.”

Ghayad, who studied eco­nomics in his home country of Lebanon and com­pleted his MBA at Boston Uni­ver­sity, is set to earn his doc­toral degree next year. He is cur­rently a vis­iting scholar at the Boston Fed and has served as a research assis­tant at the Brook­ings Insti­tu­tion, where he worked to sup­port Dickens’ work.

“Research work is a col­lec­tive endeavor, requiring the par­tic­i­pa­tion of many if any one person is to suc­ceed,” Ghayad said. “This achieve­ment would not have been pos­sible without the intel­lec­tual sup­port and guid­ance of Pro­fessor Dickens.”

– by Matt Collette

More Stories

Photo of the Capitol Building at night

High stakes for politics, SCOTUS in 2018

01.04.2018
Photo of the crashed truck that was used in the October 31st attack in Manhattan.

Weaponizing Language: How the meaning of “allahu akbar” has been distorted

11.08.2017
Northeastern logo

Why I love studying Spanish

05.29.20
Uncategorized