Skip to content

From a devastating earthquake, a blueprint for recovery

In 2009, a mas­sive earth­quake struck L’Aquila, Italy, a town two hours north of Rome where gen­er­a­tions of fam­i­lies have lived for thou­sands of years. The quake dev­as­tated the com­mu­nity so much that its cit­i­zens have not been able to return; anyone crossing into the city must wear pro­tec­tive gear and be accom­pa­nied by emer­gency personnel.

“It looks like a war zone of the worst kind,” said Matthias Ruth, a pro­fessor with dual appoint­ments in the School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs and the Depart­ment of Civil and Envi­ron­mental Engi­neering.

Ruth is part of a team of about 20 researchers from the Organ­i­sa­tion for Eco­nomic Co-​​operation and Devel­op­ment that has studied the after­math of the Italian earth­quake in hopes of teaching other cities how to improve their resilience to major dis­as­ters. The research team released a report of their rec­om­men­da­tions, “Building Resilient Regions after a National Dis­aster,” in Rome ear­lier this month.

“We need to pre­pare our­selves,” Ruth said. “That’s the intel­lec­tual ques­tion we have to face: When we rebuild, how do we do that con­sid­ering the next dis­aster? Now that we are given the oppor­tu­nity to rethink and rebuild, how do we do this in a smarter way?”

Plan­ners, engi­neers, and gov­ern­ment offi­cials in L’Aquila have begun rebuilding the rav­aged city, Ruth said. They are looking at how to bal­ance its existing nature—a quin­tes­sen­tially Italian com­mu­nity of winding streets, side­walk cafes, and close quarters—with the needs of a modern city to allow for both resilience against future dis­as­ters and an infra­struc­ture that can sup­port a new gen­er­a­tion of entre­pre­neurs and inno­va­tion. Some struc­tures will simply not be rebuilt; others may look the same but will be built using entirely new methods and materials.

“The big ques­tion is, ‘How do we use tech­nology to con­tinue to give the feel of an old city with its own charm and recreate the social fabric and some kind of authen­ticity, while also incor­po­rating modern mate­rials, sen­sors, and infor­ma­tion tech­nology to make the city a safer place?’” Ruth said. These issues, he said, rep­re­sent the key chal­lenges facing urban resilience projects, and they align with the larger debate of designing sus­tain­able cities that can evolve with both envi­ron­mental and social changes.

Ruth said lessons learned in L’Aquila—gathered from more than 400 in-​​person inter­views and inten­sive land­scape sur­veys and assessments—can be applied to cities in places like New York, New Jersey, and Con­necticut, all of which were bat­tered by super­storm Sandy. In a sign that Ruth’s report has had far-​​reaching effect, some offi­cials have announced that destroyed water­front struc­tures will either not be rebuilt or, in cases like beach­front board­walks, will be rebuilt out of con­crete, not wood like the pre­vious structures.

“This is not just about Italy,” Ruth said. “This is really a piece of the ground­work to be laid for cities all around the world.”

– by Matt Collette

More Stories

Photo of the Capitol Building at night

High stakes for politics, SCOTUS in 2018

Photo of the crashed truck that was used in the October 31st attack in Manhattan.

Weaponizing Language: How the meaning of “allahu akbar” has been distorted

Northeastern logo

Why I love studying Spanish