Skip to content

How politically effective is terrorism?

Why do some mil­i­tant groups con­tinue to use ter­rorism when it’s polit­i­cally inef­fec­tive, even coun­ter­pro­duc­tive? The answer lies in their lead­er­ship deficits, according to Max Abrahms, a ter­rorism the­o­rist and newly appointed assis­tant pro­fessor of polit­ical sci­ence whose research over the last decade has thor­oughly exam­ined the question.

“Foot sol­diers are gen­er­ally not as smart as their leaders and have fewer incen­tives against harming civil­ians,” he explained. “When they gain tac­tical autonomy within the orga­ni­za­tion, they become more likely to commit the strategic folly of tar­geting civilians.”

Abrahms’ find­ings are rooted in pre­ex­isting eco­nomic, soci­o­log­ical, and psy­cho­log­ical the­o­ries, all of which he applies to his study of mil­i­tant groups that operate in the Middle East and North Africa.

He started studying ter­rorism as a grad­uate stu­dent of inter­na­tional rela­tions at Oxford Uni­ver­sity in 2000, a year before the 9/​11 attacks. “It seemed odd that I would study ter­rorism at that time because it was the height of the dotcom era, with a lot of great jobs to be had in America cites, on Wall Street, and in Northern Cal­i­fornia,” Abrahms explained. “But I thought it was an inter­esting topic even if it wasn’t cur­rently a pivot around which the U.S. would come to under­stand its secu­rity interests.”

After leaving Oxford, he did a fel­low­ship at a Wash­ington, D.C.-based think tank, but grew dis­en­chanted with the policy world when the Iraq war went south. So, he returned to acad­emia, earning a doc­torate in polit­ical sci­ence from UCLA, and worked as a post­doc­toral fellow in the depart­ment of polit­ical sci­ence at Johns Hop­kins Uni­ver­sity prior to joining the North­eastern faculty.

His research has been fea­tured in dozens of media out­lets around the world, ranging from the The Boston Globe and The Los Angeles Times to the Jerusalem Post and Al-​​Jazeera. In April, For­eign Policy ran a couple of his essays on the Boston Marathon bombing suspects.

This case will be dis­cussed in his fall courses on ter­rorism. Next fall, the Depart­ment of Polit­ical Sci­ence will offer a master of sci­ence in secu­rity and resiliency studies, a pro­gram for which Abrahms will serve as a core fac­ulty member.

Abrahms, who also serves as a term member at the Council on For­eign Rela­tions, a non­profit mem­ber­ship orga­ni­za­tion, pub­lisher, and think tank spe­cial­izing in U.S. for­eign policy, noted that he was attracted to North­eastern not only for its growing research rep­u­ta­tion, but its engage­ment with the world. “Fac­ulty are encour­aged to make prac­tical con­tri­bu­tions to the world, whether by advising gov­ern­ments or doing inter­views with the media on policy rel­e­vant issues,” he said. “Although I am a the­o­rist, I wouldn’t be testing my the­o­ries if I didn’t think they had any real-​​world applications.”

– By Jason Kornwitz

More Stories

Photo of the Capitol Building at night

High stakes for politics, SCOTUS in 2018

Photo of the crashed truck that was used in the October 31st attack in Manhattan.

Weaponizing Language: How the meaning of “allahu akbar” has been distorted

Northeastern logo

Why I love studying Spanish