The Humanities Center Fellowship program brings together scholars from various disciplines, both within the College of Social Sciences and Humanities as well as from other colleges of Northeastern University. The Fellowship program provides a focused period of time for Northeastern Humanities Fellows to pursue research, to collaborate with others around a common theme, and to share their work with the Northeastern community.
Throughout the year, fellows discuss topical readings and one another’s pre-distributed papers. Public presentations are held for fellows to discuss their work with the Northeastern community. In addition, the center provides support for web projects and a final event that showcases collaboration and research results.
A call for applications is announced each spring semester. Both faculty and graduate students are selected to form a fellowship cohort for the following academic year.
Download information about the 2020-2021 theme and call for proposals here.
The Humanities Center invites applications on the theme of disruption and displacement. Displacement, a term in physics that evokes material dislocation, can also refer to political, emotional, and aesthetic disruptions. Literature and art can function as disruptive cultural or political interventions. Aesthetic innovations, such as new genres, and innovations in business may purposely disrupt. Mindful of the current refugee crises, displacements caused by climate change, cultural appropriations and re-appropriations as forms of displacement, and translation as one example of a strategy that might ease the effects of displacement, our goal is to encourage cross-disciplinary conversations that deepen our understanding of disruption and displacement.
Authority and subversion are mutually inextricable. Authority and associated terms such as authorship and authoritarianism express different forms and degrees of power. Subversion also comes in various forms and may be positively or negatively disruptive. Environmental degradation, technological complexity, global shifts, and the collapse of clear ideological divides between left and right-wing discourses invite reconsiderations of relationships between authority and subversion. The Humanities Center welcomes applications from scholars across disciplines whose projects consider, for example: literary or artistic strategies for claiming or subverting authority; authoritarian or subversive political or social movements; or breakdowns of consensus around ideological, aesthetic, or cultural values.
What are the shifting material and immaterial conditions that determine whether persons are perceived to be able or competent, or alternatively, disabled or incompetent? Designed and natural environments and cultural and aesthetic forms have profound effects on our perceptions and experiences of ability. Contexts for, and consequences of, judgments about ability may be social, cultural, economic, educational, historical, and/or political. Alert to President Joseph Aoun’s call, in Robot Proof, to think about how human productivity and flourishing are defined in a technologically networked era, the Humanities Center aims to create an interdisciplinary group of scholars whose projects consider how the category of “ability” (as well as its cognates, such as competence, aptitude, and health; its antonyms, such as disability, incompetence, and sickness; and the terms with which it often travels, such as commitment, will, and effort) shapes identities, cultures, representations, and lived experience.
We are the stories we tell. A variety of narratives—journalistic, artistic, and scholarly— compete to explain our cultural circumstances and to ground individual experiences within a collective reality, from the news site to the novel, from political rhetoric to religious doctrine. Yet as storytelling platforms have multiplied, audiences have fragmented, and agreement on the significance of any single narrative is increasingly difficult to achieve. The distinction famously attributed to Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan—“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts”—seems to be breaking down. The media circulation that the historian Benedict Anderson postulated as uniting citizens in “imagined communities” now seems equally capable of dividing them. We seek an interdisciplinary, humanistic conversation about how contemporary narratives of identity and experience, belonging and exclusion, are fostered or censored; how criteria of truth, feeling, or opinion are harnessed to assert a narrative’s importance; and how social and cultural institutions mediate the circulation of these narratives.
Creative productions, social organization, the making of canons and the making of nations, editing, and sculpting all require inclusions and exclusions. As boundaries blur or move, new inclusions and exclusions follow—a dynamic with ideological, political, aesthetic, and/or social implications. For the 2016-17 Residential Fellowship, The Northeastern Humanities Center fellows presented projects that consider issues or images that relate to the theme of “Inclusions and Exclusions.” For example, you may be looking at framing devices, borders and boundaries, marginalization, fences, and gatekeeping; or: strategies for delimiting units of meaning, models and metaphors, histories of exclusions and remediation, or issues such as literacy, citizenship, disability rights, evolutions of curricula, or particular cases for new inclusions in classical canons. What is in and who is out evolves: from schools to country clubs, from texts to communities to nation states, from disciplines to syllabi to fashion. Who decides, how does change happen, and with what consequences?
The appearance of design—fine detail, intricate patterning, and evidence of planning—is ubiquitous in nature and culture. The 2015-2016 Northeastern Humanities Center fellows presented projects that are concerned with aspects of design —ornamentation, utility, aesthetics, creativity, emotion, rationality, and intention— as well as projects that theorize and question principles of design. Among the questions members considered were: is design approached differently in different contexts: for example, the design of objects and physical structures, of experiments, of organizational structures, of public policies, or works of art? How should we design for change? What makes for good design? Is absence of design possible? How is design linked to unintended consequences? What is gained from reflecting on design?
The 2014-15 theme recognized wide-ranging and deeply resonant interdisciplinary conversations about “space and place,” from history to politics and from literature to architecture, including digital humanities’ embrace of Geographical Information Systems (GIS), mapping projects in biology and textual studies, and the recently coined “geo-Humanities” that critically engages with art and history in relation to geography. From the micro-design of the spaces we inhabit to the urgent environmental concerns of the planet, from local social networks to global economics, from urbanization to globalization, spatial thinking has come to inform a startling array of disciplines. Scholars working in their diverse fields and periods considered how space and place informed their research and practice.
The 2013-14 theme of “viral culture” names modes of circulation and transmission of information, ideas, and biota across time and space. The Humanities Center thinks of “viral culture” as a way to engage an array of important and emergent contemporary phenomena- related to areas as diverse as social networks, the internet, new media, public health, sexuality, marketing, and globalization. Viral culture has roots, as well, in fields as diverse as the history of public health, economics, literature, transportation, and print culture. With this theme, scholars working in diverse fields and periods will consider the ways in which the viral transmission of memes, diseases, electronic signals, print texts-of varied forms of culture-inform new research.