Skip to content
Topics
Stories

‘Is this a case about cake or about the people trying to buy a cake?’

Wedding cake topper of two grooms

The cake issue is solved. But questions about the reaches of protections for religious freedom versus protections for gay rights remain unanswered.

Using a very narrow reading of the facts of the case, the Supreme Court on Monday ruled 7-2 in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. The ruling, however, still leaves a major question unanswered, according to Northeastern law professor Dan Urman: “Is this a case about cake or about the people trying to buy a cake?”

The case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which legal scholars anticipated could set a precedent for either First Amendment protection or gay rights, did neither. Instead, the close reading of case proceedings amounted to a “punt,” said Urman, who teaches courses on Constitutional law and the U.S. Supreme Court.

 

Read the full story at News at Northeastern.

More Stories

Trump tells UN to hold China accountable for coronavirus

09.22.2020

Ruth Bader Ginsburg leaves behind an unmatched legacy. How might her death shape the 2020 election and beyond?

09.21.2020

The leading source of false claims about COVID-19? Hint: it’s not Facebook or Twitter.

09.23.20
All Stories