Skip to content
Topics
Stories

Looking ahead as U.S. troops prepare to leave Iraq behind

On Friday, Pres­i­dent Obama announced the United States would with­draw all of its troops from Iraq by the end of the year, ending the war in Iraq that lasted nearly nine years. We asked polit­ical sci­ence pro­fessor Denis Sul­livan, director of Northeastern’s Middle East Center for Peace, Cul­ture and Devel­op­ment, to offer insight on what fac­tors may have influ­enced this turn of events and the poten­tial global impact of this final withdrawal.

The war in Iraq has been ongoing for the last nine years. What circumstances — global or domestic — may have influenced Obama’s decision to finally withdraw U.S. forces?

I see at least three fac­tors guiding Pres­i­dent Obama’s deci­sion to with­draw forces. First, there are his per­sonal views. In 2002 and 2003, Obama was against the war in Iraq, even as Pres­i­dent Bush was trying to make the case for it. As Obama cam­paigned for pres­i­dent in 2007 and 2008, he “pledged to bring the war in Iraq to a respon­sible end.”  Now he is ful­filling that pledge.

Second, the Status of Forces Agree­ment (SOFA) — which Bush nego­ti­ated in 2008 prior to leaving office — called for this very thing: the with­drawal of all U.S. forces from Iraq by December 31, 2011. How­ever, this agree­ment was being rene­go­ti­ated between Iraq and the United States, and there was a chance that its terms could be changed, keeping some troops in Iraq past Jan­uary 2012. With Friday’s announce­ment, we now know that the SOFA agree­ment stands.

A third factor in Obama’s deci­sion is the con­tin­uing costs of the war. Not only has America sus­tained more than 4,400 sol­diers killed in Iraq and another 32,200 seri­ously wounded, but also, as of today, Amer­ican tax­payers have been sad­dled with a nearly one tril­lion dollar price tag for the Iraq war, with an addi­tional $2 tril­lion of future com­mit­ments, debt pay­ments and oppor­tu­nity costs. This $3 tril­lion war might soon be over from an oper­a­tional point of view, but there is much more to be done beyond this crit­ical withdrawal.

What will be the global response to the final withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq?

The United States’ allies will sup­port our country and the Iraqi gov­ern­ment; our adver­saries will say we were forced out. Those who are nei­ther enemy nor friend will likely focus on the pos­i­tive devel­op­ment for the people of Iraq, who have lost more than 115,000 cit­i­zens, in addi­tion to thou­sands of sol­diers since our inva­sion and occu­pa­tion in 2003. Many people around the world will prob­ably give high marks to Obama for ending the direct role of the U.S. mil­i­tary in Iraqi affairs. Hope­fully, world atten­tion, and espe­cially Amer­ican atten­tion, will now shift back to Afghanistan, with the goal of the United States with­drawing from that shat­tered country as well.

What impact will this withdrawal have on U.S. relations with Iraq and the Middle East?

A com­plete troop with­drawal from Iraq by December will make an enor­mous and pos­i­tive impact on our rela­tions both with Iraq and other nations in the Arab world, and poten­tially even Iran. With no U.S. troops in Iraq, there will be no phys­ical tar­gets (Amer­ican men and women in uni­form; bases; joint U.S.-Iraqi secu­rity oper­a­tions) for extremist or mil­i­tant ele­ments that want to use anti-​​Americanism for their own agendas.  It also makes the polit­ical state­ment that America is no longer an occu­pying power.  More­over, with no U.S. mil­i­tary per­sonnel of any kind in Iraq, it sends the signal that we have reversed a dev­as­tating deci­sion and are seeking a new rela­tion­ship with both Iraq and the region as a whole. This is a most timely devel­op­ment as the United States and the world con­tinue to watch devel­op­ments of the “Arab Spring” or “Arab rev­o­lu­tions.” Per­haps now we can stop the direct med­dling in Arab cit­izen move­ments, sup­port them from the side­lines and work with them as part­ners as they reform their own polit­ical sys­tems and seek to grow their economies. America is better posi­tioned now, with Pres­i­dent Obama’s announce­ment, to be that eco­nomic partner and polit­ical ally.

– by Lauren Dibble

More Stories

A ‘weird’ jobs report that’s good news nonetheless

12.03.2021
Reproductive rights activists hold abortion rights cut out letters as oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization case are held on Wednesday, December 1, 2021.

Supreme Court legitimacy at risk in abortion ban case, Northeastern legal expert says

12.02.2021
Abortion rights advocates demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, DC, United States on December 01, 2021.

Half of us could lose abortion access if Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade

12.03.21
News@Northeastern