Skip to content
Pride Month: Advancing Belonging Through Visibility, Scholarship, and Community
Apply
Stories

Louisiana v. Callais: Can states legally redraw congressional maps this close to an election?

People in this story

The U.S. Supreme Court is seen Friday, April 17, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)

The Supreme Court’s decision to reject Louisiana’s most recently drawn congressional map due to what it called an illegal racial gerrymander could throw a wrench in the 2026 primaries, with several states now weighing whether to redraw districts or delay elections. The high court’s 6-3 ruling on April 29 effectively barred states from using race as a factor in drawing congressional maps, upholding a federal court decision that struck down Louisiana’s 2024 map that contained a second majority-Black district. The state redrew its congressional map then to address concerns that its previous map had diluted its Black population’s voting power in violation of the Voting Rights Act, a landmark piece of legislation that was signed into law in 1965 by former President Lyndon B. Johnson.

Now, several states are attempting to scrap maps they previously drew to give their party a last-minute advantage ahead of voting. Typically redrawn every 10 years, congressional maps have become flashpoints in an escalating legal and political battle in blue and red states following the ruling.

Continue reading at Northeastern Global News.

More Stories

‘A deliberate crippling’: NIH researchers, Mass. scientists sound alarm over new funding rules

06.11.2026

Study finds Highway 101 widening made Marin-Sonoma Narrows significantly hotter

06.09.2026
Heavy traffic jam during rush hour at sunset or dawn.

A new way to measure the traffic impacts of development offers promise, but is not foolproof

06.15.26
Northeastern Global News