Skip to content

Machu Picchu’s 100th Anniversary

Sunday marked the 100th Anniver­sary of the dis­covery of Machu Picchu — the ancient Incan city in Peru — by Amer­ican archae­ol­o­gist and his­tory pro­fessor Hiram Bingham. Yanet Monica Canavan, the director of Northeastern’s Dia­logue of Civ­i­liza­tions pro­grams in Peru, and a native of the country, talks about the his­tor­ical sig­nif­i­cance of the dis­covery of Machu Picchu, its impact on the economy in Peru and how mod­ern­iza­tion of the site may be causing irre­versible damage.

Why was the dis­covery of Machu Picchu in 1911 a sig­nif­i­cant moment in history?

It was the first oppor­tu­nity that our world had to learn about this mys­te­rious Incan royal city located high among the moun­tains. In the 16th cen­tury, Spanish invaders destroyed most of the Incans’ civ­i­liza­tion, but never found Machu Picchu during their con­quest in Peru. For that, it is highly sig­nif­i­cant as a rel­a­tively intact cul­tural site, which has helped it garner atten­tion from his­to­rians, aca­d­e­mics and tourists across the globe. The dis­covery not only changed the per­cep­tion of the world; it also changed the way people thought about the world and increased their under­standing of the sig­nif­i­cance of ancient civilizations.

On a more per­sonal note, it has pro­vided incred­ibly enriching expe­ri­ences for North­eastern stu­dents par­tic­i­pating in the Peru Dia­logue of Civ­i­liza­tions programs.

How impor­tant is Machu Picchu to Peru’s tourism industry and overall economy?

Peru’s economy has grown in the last few years due largely to tourism — the country’s third-​​largest industry. Machu Picchu is the most pop­ular des­ti­na­tion in Peru and since 1983, when it was named a UNESCO World Her­itage Site, there has been an enor­mous increase in tourism, with as many as 2,000 people vis­iting the site daily.

Machu Picchu con­tributes to both the tourism industry and the entire economy by cre­ating jobs and busi­ness oppor­tu­ni­ties and bringing new money into the country. The gov­ern­ment uses the largest por­tion of rev­enue from Machu Picchu tourism for devel­op­ment projects.

In the 90’s, the Peru­vian gov­ern­ment approved the con­struc­tion of a cable car, luxury hotel, bou­tiques and restau­rants to pro­vide Machu Picchu tourists with greater access and com­fort. This was met with protest by locals and UNESCO, which is con­sid­ering adding it to the List of World Her­itage Sites in Danger. Should Peru work to pre­serve rather than mod­ernize the site for tourist purposes?

This topic is very con­tro­ver­sial, as tourism is crit­ical to Peru’s economy. While increased tourism brings money to the country, it is also dam­ages the his­toric ruins — foot traffic has caused slow but notice­able ero­sion to the site. Pol­lu­tion has increased because of tourists who camp and litter along the Inca Trail. The nearby city of Aguas Calientes, once tran­quil, is now a full of filth and noisy hotels that were built to accom­mo­date tourists. Many nat­ural species are also disappearing.

On the other hand, mod­ern­izing the site means bringing in out­side dol­lars to sup­port the com­mu­nity with new facil­i­ties and ser­vices. The rail­ways ben­efit both locals and tourists. These endeavors also encourage Peru­vian national pride and civic involve­ment, and the com­mu­nity is proud of its Incan her­itage. Peru­vians should aim to bal­ance the advan­tages and dis­ad­van­tages that tourism produces.

– by Kara Shemin

More Stories

Photo of the Capitol Building at night

High stakes for politics, SCOTUS in 2018

Photo of the crashed truck that was used in the October 31st attack in Manhattan.

Weaponizing Language: How the meaning of “allahu akbar” has been distorted

Northeastern logo

Why I love studying Spanish