Skip to content
Apply
Stories

Philanthropists seeking to fix big problems must tread carefully – here’s how they can make their efforts more compatible with democracy

People in this story

The Conversation, January 2022

How should wealthy people respond to daunting problems like racism, economic inequality and climate change? Leading thinkers have long questioned whether philanthropy offers appropriate or meaningful solutions to vexing challenges. Eighteenth-century philosopher Mary Wollstonecraft called private giving “the most specious system of slavery.” Wollstonecraft saw charitable and philanthropic efforts as softening the effects of unjust laws and political institutions – rather than dismantling them. A century later, the poet and playwright Oscar Wilde argued that private giving “creates a multitude of sins.” Wilde thought that charity “degrades and demoralizes” while preventing the horrors of systemic injustice from being recognized by those who suffer from it.

Civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. held that philanthropy is “commendable” but insufficient in the face of challenges like war, racism and poverty. “True compassion,” King wrote, is “to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring.”

Continue reading at The Conversation.

More Stories

Secret Service agents stand on the tarmac after President Biden boarded Air Force One at Manchester Airport in New Hampshire in March.

“It is not sustainable for a democracy”: tighter security likely at political events after shooting at Trump rally

07.22.2024
Donald Trump at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee on July 15.

RNC viewership is plummeting

07.22.2024
Republican vice presidential candidate Sen. J.D. Vance of Ohio and his wife, Usha Chilukuri Vance, arrive on the floor during the first day of the 2024 Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum, Monday, July 15, 2024, in Milwaukee.

By tapping JD Vance, Trump charts MAGA’s future

07.23.24
All Stories