Skip to content
Topics
Stories

Philosophy reframes today’s concerns

Last week, North­eastern hosted the 29th Inter­na­tional Social Phi­los­ophy Con­fer­ence, an oppor­tu­nity for experts and stu­dents to weigh deep ques­tions around some of the biggest issues of our time.

Some­times finding a new way to look at an issue can help create new solu­tions, said Serena Parekh, an assis­tant pro­fessor of phi­los­ophy and reli­gion in Northeastern’s Col­lege of Social Sci­ences and Human­i­ties. Parekh pre­sented a paper on bringing democ­racy to refugees during a panel Thursday, the first day of the three-​​day conference.

Parekh said that wealthy Western nations realize they must weigh the extent to which they can help refugees and other dis­placed or state­less people by taking some into their own borders.

“One thing that is agreed upon is the terms of the debate,” said Parekh, though the answers from indi­vidual coun­tries vary. While it may seem optimal to have all par­ties sharing a per­spec­tive, that can be lim­iting because it pre­vents nations from con­sid­ering alter­na­tive, out-​​of-​​the-​​box solutions.

Refugees as a whole, Parekh said, are excluded from democ­racy, both on a local and global level. “The heart of what it means to be state­less is to be right­less, in that you lack a com­mu­nity to pro­tect your rights” she said.

Western nations, which ulti­mately take in just a tiny frac­tion of refugees, should instead look for ways to pro­mote democ­racy and pro­tect the rights of dis­placed and state­less people.

Pro­fessor of phi­los­ophy Stephen Nathanson, who orga­nized the con­fer­ence, pre­sented a paper on how phi­los­ophy can broaden a dis­cus­sion and reduce polar­iza­tion between groups whose opin­ions are closer than they might seem. He pointed to remarks by Pres­i­dent Barack Obama, who at the start of his term cited “philo­soph­ical dif­fer­ences” of opinion regarding the role of gov­ern­ment in society as a major factor in pol­i­tics and public discourse.

“These really are philo­soph­ical dif­fer­ences,” Nathanson said, dis­cussing the apparent polarity between those on oppo­site ends of the polit­ical spec­trum. “Phi­los­ophy is not some­thing you find in old books or that gets dis­cussed by weird people like our­selves. These are real issues in the real world.”

Nathanson dis­cussed the broad spec­trum of options for a government’s role in the economy, not simply cap­i­talism and socialism. Pre­senting a broader array of options can reframe the debate and force people to recon­sider their posi­tions, which may not be as con­crete as first con­sid­ered, he said.

“When we see these issues in a ‘two poles’ kind of way, there are so few options that, of course, people are polar­ized,” Nathanson said. “But when we think about things along a broader spec­trum, I think most people would realize that we aren’t so far away.”

– by Matt Collette

More Stories

Photo of the Capitol Building at night

High stakes for politics, SCOTUS in 2018

01.04.2018
Photo of the crashed truck that was used in the October 31st attack in Manhattan.

Weaponizing Language: How the meaning of “allahu akbar” has been distorted

11.08.2017
Northeastern logo

Why I love studying Spanish

05.29.20
Uncategorized