Skip to content
Topics
Stories

The Mindset Behind Mass Murder

Last week’s ter­rorist attack in Norway stunned that nation and the world. We asked Jack Levin, the Brud­nick Dis­tin­guished Pro­fessor of Soci­ology and Crim­i­nology at North­eastern Uni­ver­sity, who spe­cial­izes in the study of vio­lence and hate, to dis­cuss the mindset of the accused killer and the poten­tial for changes in Norway’s judi­cial system, which imposes rel­a­tively lenient sen­tences for brutal crimes.

What can be learned from this tragedy?

Sadly, we learn that mass murder can happen any­where, even in a country where res­i­dents pride them­selves on their peaceful lives, their respect for dif­fer­ences and their low rate of vio­lent crime. More­over, we learn that our enemy is not Islam; it is fanati­cism. The sus­pected killer was a white right-​​wing extremist, not a Muslim terrorist.

What is the sig­nif­i­cance of the accused Anders Behring Breivik’s manifesto?

The sus­pected killer’s man­i­festo indi­cates that he had planned his crimes over a lengthy period of time. In addi­tion, he felt com­pelled to jus­tify his mur­derous attack in writing, in order to appear to be more of a victim than a vil­lain. I think that he counts on his man­i­festo to humanize him. The sin­cerity of Breivik’s polit­ical moti­va­tion is called into ques­tion by his pla­gia­rism of the Unabomber’s man­i­festo that he took as his own. It seems that cer­tain mass killers — including Theodore Kaczynski, Seung-​​Hui Cho, and now Breivik — have a psy­cho­log­ical need to explain their heinous crimes to friends, family and the public. Appar­ently, even they do not wish to be seen as evil monsters.

Breivik faces a max­imum of 21 years in prison in Norway. How often do these types of hor­rific, high-​​profile murder cases lead to changes in a country’s judi­cial system?

High-​​profile crimes often inspire major changes in crim­inal jus­tice policy. For example, John Hinckley was found not guilty by reason of insanity for attempting to assas­si­nate Pres­i­dent Reagan in March 1981, which angered many Amer­i­cans. It caused the courts to place a greater burden on defen­dants who use that defense. In addi­tion, new laws and poli­cies to pro­tect mur­dered chil­dren — including Megan’s Law, Jessica’s Law in Florida and Amber Alert — have been enacted after the nation heard emo­tional tes­ti­mony on the part of the vic­tims’ fam­i­lies. Assuming he were con­victed, it would not be sur­prising if the 21-​​year max­imum prison sen­tence awaiting Breivik were extended to a life sen­tence for future killers.

– by Greg St. Martin

More Stories

Photo of the Capitol Building at night

High stakes for politics, SCOTUS in 2018

01.04.2018
Photo of the crashed truck that was used in the October 31st attack in Manhattan.

Weaponizing Language: How the meaning of “allahu akbar” has been distorted

11.08.2017
Northeastern logo

Why I love studying Spanish

05.29.20
Uncategorized