Skip to content

Understanding Ferguson

Understanding Ferguson panel

Wednesday evening’s event—titled “Pro­filing, Protest, and Politics: Understanding Ferguson”—represented the sev­enth install­ment in Northeastern’s series on civic sus­tain­ability.

During the Q-​​and-​​A por­tion of a panel dis­cus­sion Wednesday night on the ongoing social and polit­ical unrest in Fer­guson, Mis­souri, one North­eastern law stu­dent under­scored the paradox framing the fallout from this summer’s events in the St. Louis suburb: The com­mu­nity response, he said, is at once the result of the shooting death of Michael Brown and also about much more than this spe­cific incident.

That idea was a promi­nent theme throughout the 90-​​minute con­ver­sa­tion between an inter­dis­ci­pli­nary panel of North­eastern pro­fes­sors and more than 200 stu­dents, fac­ulty, and staff who filled the Curry Stu­dent Center Ballroom.

The fact is that a young man has been killed. The fact is that a com­mu­nity has been thrown into dis­array,” said pan­elist Amy Far­rell, an asso­ciate pro­fessor of crim­i­nology and crim­inal jus­tice. “What was so impor­tant about Fer­guson is that we saw the anger of the com­mu­nity so vis­cer­ally. So the con­ver­sa­tion really is about this notion of com­mu­nity trust.”

Brown, an 18-​​year-​​old black man, was fatally shot by a white police officer on Aug. 9. The shooting sparked wide­spread unrest as res­i­dents sought answers, which also led to riots, looting, and mil­i­ta­rized responses from law enforce­ment. Numerous inves­ti­ga­tions into the shooting are cur­rently underway.

Wednesday evening’s event—titled “Pro­filing, Protest, and Politics: Understanding Ferguson”—represented the sev­enth install­ment in Northeastern’s series on civic sus­tain­ability. The series—Con­flict. Civility. Respect. Peace. North­eastern Reflects—is hosted by Dis­tin­guished Pro­fessor of Polit­ical Sci­ence Michael Dukakis in con­junc­tion with the Pres­i­den­tial Council on Inclu­sion and Diver­sity. Wednesday night’s event was pre­sented by the Col­lege of Social Sci­ences and Human­i­ties, the School of Law, and the Office of Stu­dent Affairs.

The event’s panel com­prised Far­rell; Rod­erick Ire­land, Dis­tin­guished Pro­fessor of Crim­i­nology and Crim­inal Jus­tice and a former chief jus­tice of the Mass­a­chu­setts Supreme Judi­cial Court; Sarah Jackson, an assis­tant pro­fessor of com­mu­ni­ca­tion studies; and John Portz, a pro­fessor of polit­ical sci­ence. Ralph Martin, senior vice pres­i­dent and gen­eral counsel for North­eastern, mod­er­ated the discussion.

The pan­elists offered their insight into many of the fac­tors that led to and fueled the unrest in Fer­guson, including police response, the community’s rela­tion­ship with law enforce­ment, and the media’s por­trayal of the events.

Ire­land said the court system is society’s best option to address sit­u­a­tions such as the shooting in Fer­guson. “On any issue that raises ques­tions about the denial of civil lib­er­ties, a person’s best bet for jus­tice would be a court of law,” Ire­land said.

Portz said as tragic as the events are, there may be a window of oppor­tu­nity for the city and res­i­dents to develop mean­ingful cit­izen engage­ment in public governance. “I would like to think of this as an oppor­tu­nity,” Portz said. “I guess it raises in my mind do we have the polit­ical courage across the country to make changes?”

During the Q-​​and-​​A, Jackson was asked to elab­o­rate on the con­cept of “right­eous trouble,” a term she used ear­lier in the evening to describe protests as an impor­tant demo­c­ratic tool. In par­tic­ular, she was asked to dis­cuss the best prac­tices for people who want to use “right­eous trouble” as a tool to make their voices heard without sab­o­taging its value by pro­voking vio­lence and looting.

I think what is impor­tant in terms of framing the story for a com­mu­nity that is trying to create change is for them to clearly com­mu­ni­cate that the small minority of people who are engaging in unnec­es­sary crim­inal activity aren’t rep­re­sen­ta­tive of their goals,” Jackson said.

-By Joe O’Connell

More Stories

Photo of the Capitol Building at night

High stakes for politics, SCOTUS in 2018

Photo of the crashed truck that was used in the October 31st attack in Manhattan.

Weaponizing Language: How the meaning of “allahu akbar” has been distorted

Northeastern logo

Why I love studying Spanish