Skip to content
Apply
Stories

Mass shootings: Limiting magazine capacity saves lives and doesn’t infringe on gun rights

People in this story

USA Today, August 2020

Days following the anniversary of one of the nation’s worst weekends of senseless bloodshed, the killing of 32 victims in mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit overturned a California ban of the very type of large-capacity magazine that facilitated the two massacres. Approved in 2016 by a healthy voter majority, Proposition 63 outlawed magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition.

“California’s near-categorical ban of (large-capacity magazines) strikes at the core of the Second Amendment — the right to armed self-defense,” Judge Kenneth Lee wrote for the court majority.  

However, it is hard to imagine a situation in which some law-abiding gun owner would need to shoot off dozens of rounds in defense of self or others. It is a stretch to conceive of a home invasion by a horde of armed intruders, so many that a rapid-fire response would be required to ward off the threat.

Continue reading at USA Today.

More Stories

Facial Recognition Heads to Class. Will Students Benefit?

03.01.2024

Brewster resident named Mass. USA TODAY Woman of the Year for plastic bottle ban efforts

03.01.2024

With ShotSpotter staying in Chicago for the time being, dispute continues over the system’s usefulness

03.04.24
All Stories