Skip to content
Apply
Stories

ShotSpotter improves detection and response to gunfire, but doesn’t reduce crime, Northeastern research finds

People in this story

ShotSpotter gunfire detection technology has delivered as promised in terms of enabling police to quickly detect and respond to gunshots in two American cities, research from Northeastern University finds. But the controversial technology has not translated into public safety gains, according to the research titled, “The Impact of Gunshot Detection Technology on Gun Violence in Kansas City and Chicago: A Multi-pronged Evaluation.”

“It’s quicker at detecting gunshots and gets officers on the scene quicker,” says Eric Piza, professor of criminology and criminal justice and director of Crime Analysis Initiatives at Northeastern. “However, we found that none of those procedural benefits translated to any public safety gains,” Piza continues. “Gun violence did not reduce in either (Kansas City or Chicago) following the introduction of ShotSpotter, and shootings were not anymore likely to be solved in either city following the introduction of ShotSpotter.”

Read more at Northeastern Global News.

More Stories

10/29/26 - Oakland, CA. - Oakland grad students share neutral policy analysis on California measures ahead of highly-charged midterms on Thursday, Oct. 29, 2026. Photo by Lachlan Cunningham for Northeastern University

Oakland grad students offer free, research-backed policy analysis during election week

11.02.2026
10/31/17 - BOSTON, MA. - Stock images of pumpkins on Halloween on Oct. 31, 2017. Photo by Adam Glanzman/Northeastern University

Halloween originated in Scotland 2,000 years ago – so how did it become so big in America? Northeastern historians explain

10.29.2026
Georgia Democratic Senate candidate Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., speaks at an election night event, Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2026, in Atlanta. (AP Photo/Mike Stewart)

2026 midterm election results: Who won the key House and Senate races?

11.04.26
Northeastern Global News