Skip to content
Apply
Stories

Are public officials facing greater danger today than before?

People in this story

Supreme Court Associate Justices Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett testify on the court's FY 2027 budget request before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government on Capitol Hill on July 14, 2026. (Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images)

Being the president of the United States may come with inherent risks to life and limb. But what if you’re the district court judge in a county judge in New Mexico or a school board member in suburban Virginia? Political violence may have historically been reserved for the most prominent public officials, but in recent years, threats have been documented across all facets of government. There have been three assassination attempts on President Donald Trump’s life since 2024. This month, Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan requested more funding for the court’s security, with Kagan noting during congressional testimony that the court’s police anticipate a 38% increase in violent threats this year. That follows a 28% increase in 2025, she said.

Those data points are certainly indicative of a trend. But getting a handle on whether this latest wave of threats against public officials is historically anomalous is challenging, not least because perceptions of what constitutes threatening behavior has evolved, said Kevin Drakulich, an associate professor of criminology and criminal justice at Northeastern, who studies the politics of crime. 

Continue reading at Northeastern Global News.

More Stories

A hand interacts with an AI chatbot on a smartphone screen, glowing under dramatic red and blue lighting in a dark environment.

For most mental health conditions, AI remains a liability, research finds

07.27.2026

Explosion of data centers is fueling a political backlash even as economy depends on them

07.27.2026

The Value and the Values of College

07.27.26
Op-eds