Skip to content
Connect
Stories

Climate change has made history this election cycle. But how will it fare in November?

People in this story

Photo by Anthony Behar/Sipa USA
A protestpr holds up a sign during the U.S. Youth Climate Strike at Columbus Circle in New York, NY, March 15, 2019. Thousands of students around the world skipped school Friday to protest lack of action on climate change.

If the presidential debate planned for Thursday night had taken place as planned, it’s likely that climate change would have been a topic. The first debate featured the longest discussion of climate change of any United States presidential debate to date. But while the issue has gotten unprecedented attention this cycle, climate policy in the U.S. still has a long way to go, says Jennie C. Stephens, dean’s professor of sustainability science and policy at Northeastern.

For the most part, says Stephens, the government’s approach to climate science has been to engineer technological fixes to problems such as rising greenhouse gas emissions, wildfires, and drought—a kind of whack-a-mole where global health is at stake.

The first—and possibly only—presidential debate of the cycle highlighted this approach, says Stephens, who is also director of the School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs and director of strategic research collaborations in the Global Resilience Institute.

Continue reading at News@Northeastern.

More Stories

Northeastern professor and the COVID States Project say CDC overestimating number of vaccinated Americans

03.21.2023

What can Donald Trump actually know about his own prosecution?

03.21.2023

Experts at Northeastern Women’s History Month Symposium event weigh in on the growing censorship movement in America

03.24.23
News@Northeastern