Skip to content
Apply
Stories

Free speech on social media doesn’t mean the same thing around the world

People in this story

Photo by Matthew Modoono/Northeastern University

Facebook, Google, Instagram, and other social media giants are based in the United States, where they have faced relatively little government oversight. But their reach extends around the world, influencing a wide spectrum of audiences in a variety of ways. A Northeastern survey of four diverse democracies found that people in other countries differ from Americans when it comes to opinions as to how social media companies should be regulated, with respondents in the United Kingdom, South Korea, and Mexico favoring stricter content moderation than people in the U.S.—especially in cases that cause harm or distress.

Governments around the world have debated regulations to curb the misinformation and hate speech that have proliferated  on social media. The study, led by Northeastern journalism faculty members John Wihbey and Myojung Chung, compared public opinion across the four nations on issues of online censorship, free speech, and social-media regulation.

Continue reading at News@Northeastern.

More Stories

To understand the next pandemic, we must understand our own collective behavior — these researchers want to be ready

09.12.2024
Former President Donald Trump shakes hands with Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris during the ABC News presidential debate — the pair’s first.

Trump-Harris debate takeaways: Experts dissect body language, policy banter and other moments

09.12.2024

What is civil asset forfeiture, the unlikely center of Netflix’s action movie ‘Rebel Ridge’? Expert explains the reality behind the movie

09.13.24
All Stories