Skip to content
Connect
Stories

Free speech on social media doesn’t mean the same thing around the world

People in this story

Photo by Matthew Modoono/Northeastern University

Facebook, Google, Instagram, and other social media giants are based in the United States, where they have faced relatively little government oversight. But their reach extends around the world, influencing a wide spectrum of audiences in a variety of ways. A Northeastern survey of four diverse democracies found that people in other countries differ from Americans when it comes to opinions as to how social media companies should be regulated, with respondents in the United Kingdom, South Korea, and Mexico favoring stricter content moderation than people in the U.S.—especially in cases that cause harm or distress.

Governments around the world have debated regulations to curb the misinformation and hate speech that have proliferated  on social media. The study, led by Northeastern journalism faculty members John Wihbey and Myojung Chung, compared public opinion across the four nations on issues of online censorship, free speech, and social-media regulation.

Continue reading at News@Northeastern.

More Stories

Is the US now a four-party system? Progressives split Democrats, and far-right divides Republicans

06.05.2023

Are liberals truly more depressed than conservatives?

05.31.2023

International committee moves closer to treaty on plastic pollution—and this Northeastern policy expert is helping to lead the way

06.06.23
News@Northeastern