Skip to content
Apply
Stories

Free speech on social media doesn’t mean the same thing around the world

People in this story

Photo by Matthew Modoono/Northeastern University

Facebook, Google, Instagram, and other social media giants are based in the United States, where they have faced relatively little government oversight. But their reach extends around the world, influencing a wide spectrum of audiences in a variety of ways. A Northeastern survey of four diverse democracies found that people in other countries differ from Americans when it comes to opinions as to how social media companies should be regulated, with respondents in the United Kingdom, South Korea, and Mexico favoring stricter content moderation than people in the U.S.—especially in cases that cause harm or distress.

Governments around the world have debated regulations to curb the misinformation and hate speech that have proliferated  on social media. The study, led by Northeastern journalism faculty members John Wihbey and Myojung Chung, compared public opinion across the four nations on issues of online censorship, free speech, and social-media regulation.

Continue reading at News@Northeastern.

More Stories

Can this strategic plan promote better well being for people who suffer from psychosis? 

12.05.2024

Northeastern delegation heads to South Korea for pivotal UN plastic pollution treaty talks

11.21.2024

How will AI scribes affect the quality of health care?

12.06.24
All Stories