Book & Journal Publications

Illingworth, P.  (2019). Giving Well: Philanthropy for Human Rights. In Valentin Beck, Stefan Gosepath, Henning Hahn, and Robert Lepenies(Eds.), Dimensions of poverty. Berlin: Springer, 2019.

• Basl, J., and Schouten, G.  (2018). Can We Use Social Policy to Enhance Compliance with Moral Obligations to Animals? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21(3) 629-647
• Bucar, E.M. (2018). Islamic virtue ethics. In N.E. Snow (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of virtue. New York: Oxford University of Press.
• Delmas, C. & Aas. Sean.  (2018). Sexual Reorientation in Ideal and Non-Ideal Theory, Journal of Political Philosophy 26, 4, 463-485. (Delmas 1st author)
• Delmas, C. (2018). Is Hacktivism the New Civil Disobedience? Raisons Politiques, 69(1), 63-81.
• Fallis, D. (2018).  What is Deceptive Lying?  In A. Stokke and E. Michaelson (Eds.), Lying: Language, knowledge, ethics, and politics (pp. 25-42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fallis, D. (2018). Adversarial Epistemology on the Internet.  In D. Coady and J. Chase (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Applied Epistemology (pp. 54-68).  New York: Routledge.
• Fallis, D. (2018). On Playing Cowboys and Indians.  In J. South and K. Engles, Westworld and philosophy (pp. 5-14).  New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Fallis, D., & Zelinski, D. (2018). Tom Petty Didn’t Really Need to Know. In M. Volpert, and R. Auxier (Eds.), Tom Petty and philosophy (pp. 107-118).  Chicago, IL: Open Court.
• Fitelson, B. (2018).  Closure, Counter-Closure, and Inferential Knowledge In C. de Almeida, R. Borges and P. Klein (Eds.), Explaining Knowledge: New Essays on the Gettier Problem.  Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Borges, R., Fitelson, B., & Braden C. (Eds.). (2018).  Knowledge, scepticism, and defeat: Themes from Klein.  PhilPapers.
• Hosein, A. (2018).  Racial Profiling and a Reasonable Sense of Inferior Political Status.  The Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(3), e1-e20.
• Hosein, A. (2018). Sex Stereotyping.  In P. Garavaso (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Analytic Feminism.  London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Kelting, W. (2018).  Leveraging Agency: Young Jain women’s ritual innovations through the Updhan Fast.  In A. Alloco and B. Pennington (Eds.), Ritual innovation: Strategic interventions in South Asia religion (pp. 191-206).  Albany: SUNY Press.
• Lee, J. (2018). Daosim and philosophy.  In D. Pritchard (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Mathiesen, K. (2018).  Fake News and Critical Thinking.  In D. Agosto (Ed.), Information Literacy in the Age of Fake News.  Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio Publishers.
• Sandler, R. (2018). Gene drives and species conservation: An ethical analysis. In I. Braverman (Ed.), Gene editing, law, and the environment. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Sandler, R. (2018).  Is Considering the Interests of Plants Absurd?  In M. Di Paola and A. Kallhoff (Eds.), Plant ethics (pp. 40-50).  New York: Routledge.
• Sandler, R. (2018). An Ethical Theory Analysis of the Food System Discourse.   In K. Thompson and P. Thompson (Eds.), Agricultural ethics in East Asian perspectives (pp. 133-144).  Dordrecht: Springer.
• Foley, M., Forber, P., Smead, R., & Riedl, C. (2018). Conflict and convention in dynamic networks.  Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 15(140), 20170835.
• Smith, M. (2018). Reliance Structures: How Urban Public Policy Shapes Human Agency. In D. Boonin (Ed.),  The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy, (pp. 809-825).  Palgrave MacMillan
• Smith, M. (2018). Political Creativity: A Skeptical View. In B. Gaut and M. Kieran (Eds.), Creativity and philosophy (pp. 369-390).  New York: Routledge.

• Crane, J.K., & Sandler, R.  (2017).  Natural, artifactual, and moral goodness.  The Journal of Ethics, 21(3), 291-307.
• Fitelson, B. (2017). Confirmation, causation, and Simpson’s paradox. Episteme.
• Hosein, A. (2017). Responsibility and self-defense: Can we have it all? Res Publica, 23(3), 367-385.
• Hosein, A. (2017). Do you have to let it linger? – Political membership that remains after territorial exit. South African Journal of Philosophy, 36(1), 24-32.
• Lee, J.  (2017).  Ethnography and ethics. The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, doi:10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee835
• Parekh, S.  (2017).  The philosophy behind sanctuary jurisdictions.  Human Rights at Home Blog, 11 December 2017.
• Parekh, S.  (2017).  Book review: Strangers in our midst: The political philosophy of immigration by David Miller. Political Theory, doi.org/10.1177/0090591717725308
• Sandler, R. (2017). De-extinction and conservation genetics in the Anthropocene. Recreating the Wild: De-extinction, Technology, and the Ethics of Conservation, Special Report, Hastings Center Report 47(4), S43-S47. DOI: 10.1002/hast.751
• Sandler, R. (2017). De-extinction: Costs, benefits and ethics. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1, 0105, doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0105
• Sandler, R. (2017). Techno-conversation in the Anthropocene: What does it mean to save a species? In U.K. Heise J. Christensen, & M. Niemann (Eds.) The Routledge companion to the environmental humanities (Chapter 7, pp. 72-81). New York: Routledge.
• Sandler, R. (2017). Environmental virtue ethics: Value, normativity, and right action. In S.M. Gardiner, & A. Thompson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199941339.013.20.
• Smith, M.N.  (2017).  Intentions: Past, present, and future.  Philosophical Explorations, 20(Supplement II), 1–12.
• Vasend, O., Sober, E., & Fitelson, B. (2017). The philosophical significance of Stein’s paradox. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 7(3), 411-433.

• Delmas, C. (2016). Civil disobedience. Philosophy Compass, 11(1), 681-691.
• Aas, S., & Delmas, C. (2016). The ethics of sexual reorientation: What should clinicians and researchers do? Journal of Medical Ethics, 42(6), 340-347. (Editor’s Choice).
• Fitelson, B. (2016). Solutions to some open problems from Slaney. Australasian Journal of Logic, 13(4).
• Smead, R., & Forber P. (2016). The coevolution of recognition and social behavior. Scientific Reports, 6. DOI: 10.1038/srep25813.
• Forber, P., & Smead, R. (2016). The evolution of spite, recognition, and morality. Philosophy of Science, 83, 884-896.
• Sandler, R. (2016). ‘The Anthropocene’, ecosystem management, and environmental virtue. Cuadernos de Bioetica, 27(3), 357-368.
• Smead, R. (2016). On the rationality of inconsistent predictions: The March Madness paradox. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 43, 163-169.

• Delmas, C. (2015). The ethics of government whistleblowing. Social Theory and Practice, 41(1), 77-105.
• Hartmann, S. & Fitelson, B. (2015). A new Garber-style solution to the problem of old evidence. Philosophy of Science, 82(4).
• Fitelson, B. (2015). The strongest possible Lewisian triviality result. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 4, 69-74.
• Easwaran, K., & Fitelson, B. (2015). Accuracy, coherence, and evidence. In T. Szabo Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology (Volume 5). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Fitelson, B., & Osherson, D. (2015). Remarks on “Random sequences”. Australasian Journal of Logic.
• Forber, P., & Smead, R. (2015). Evolution and the classification of social behavior. Biology and Philosophy, 30(3), 405-421.
• Smead, R. (2015). The role of social interaction in the evolution of learning. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66, 161-180.
• Haydari, S., & Smead, R. (2015). Does longer copyright protection help or harm scientific knowledge creation? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(2), 23.
• Setta, S.M., & Shemie, S.D.  (2015).  An explanation and analysis of how world religions formulate their ethical decisions on withdrawing treatment and determining death. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 10, 6 DOI 10.1186/s13010-015-0025-x

• Delmas, C. (2014). Samaritanism and civil disobedience. Res Publica, 20(3), 295-313.
• Delmas, C. (2014). Samaritanism and political legitimacy. Analysis, 74(2), 254-262.
• Delmas, C. (2014). The civic duty to report crime and corruption. The Ethics Forum/Les Ateliers de l’Éthique 9(1), 50-64.
• Delmas, C. (2014). Political resistance: A matter of fairness. Law and Philosophy, 33(4), 465-488.
• Allen, D., Eliassi-Rad, & Fitelson, B. (2014). A proposal for decreasing geographical inequality in college admissions. In J. Renker & J. Miller (Eds.), The future of affirmative action, Chapter 12 (Appendix). New York: Century Foundation Press.
• Briggs, R., Cariani, F., Easwaran,K., & Fitelson, B. (2014). Individual coherence and group coherence. In J. Lackey (Ed.), Essays in collective epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Fitelson, B., & Hájek, A. (2014). Declarations of independence. Synthese, 194(10), 3979-3995.
• Smead, R. (2014). Deception and the evolution of plasticity. Philosophy of Science, 81(5) 852-865.
• Smead, R., Sandler, R., Forber, P., & Basl, J. (2014). A bargaining game analysis of international climate negotiations. Nature Climate Change, 4(6), 442-445.
• Forber, P., & Smead, R. (2014). The evolution of fairness through spite. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 281, 20132439.
• McLoone, B., & Smead, R. (2014). The ontogeny and evolution of human collaboration. Biology and Philosophy, 29(4), 559-576.
• Forber, P., & Smead, R. (2014). An evolutionary paradox for pro-social behavior. Journal of Philosophy, 111(3), 151-166.

• Fitelson, B. (2013). Gibbard’s collapse theorem for the indicative conditional: An axiomatic Approach. In M.P. Bonacina, & M.E. Stickel (Eds.), Automated Reasoning and Mathematics: Essays in Memory of William W. McCune. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNAI Festschrift Series). New York: Springer.
• Smead, R., & Forber, P. (2013). The evolutionary dynamics of spite in finite populations. Evolution, 67(3), 698-707.