Skip to content

Is a millionaire tax the silver bullet for income inequality? This economist isn’t so sure

People in this story

A woman holds a lot of hundred dollar bills in her hands. Without a face. Close-up from a low angle.

Every public school student in Massachusetts will get free lunch, and it’s all thanks to the money generated by a new state tax on millionaires. The new 4% tax on income over $1 million, which voters approved last year and exists alongside the state’s fixed 5% income tax, will generate $1 billion of the state’s $56.2 billion budget for fiscal year 2024. The money will fund education and infrastructure projects in Massachusetts and is estimated to affect only about 0.6% of households, according to the Center for State Policy Analysis.

Massachusetts is one of several states, including California, Washington, New York and Connecticut, that is looking for ways to tax their wealthiest residents and start to reduce the gap in income equality in the U.S. These policies have their critics, with some arguing their economic viability is still unproven and that they promote costly tax avoidance.

But Massachusetts is one of the first states to show how the money generated by a fraction of its residents could benefit people statewide. Is it proof a millionaire tax is the silver bullet for income inequality that many hope it could be? Bob Triest, professor and chair of economics at Northeastern University, says the policy has a clear appeal, but it’s not that simple.

Continue reading at Northeastern Global News.

More Stories

Sen. Dianne Feinstein remembered as trailblazer for women in politics, ardent defender of human rights

The Pentagon is seen on Sunday, Aug. 27, 2023, in Washington.

Homeland security expert details what would a government shutdown mean for US national defense

The Google sign is shown over an entrance to the company’s new building in New York on Wednesday, Sept. 6, 2023.

Google monopoly trial shows appetite for enforcement on Big Tech, antitrust experts say