Skip to content
Apply
Stories

Northeastern research identifies inequities in exposure to PFAS in New Jersey drinking water.

People in this story

Polluted brown running water falling into a white sink from tap
image of dirty brown water coming out of silver, slightly rusted faucet

PFAS, or forever chemicals, are widespread and more likely to be found in public water systems serving low-income communities and communities of color in New Jersey, according to new research from Northeastern University. “This really comes out of a long tradition of environmental justice research that talks about the overburdened nature for people of color and of low income,” says Phil Brown, university distinguished professor of sociology and health sciences and the director of the Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute at Northeastern. 

The findings were published Wednesday in the latest issue of Environmental Health Perspectives. PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are a group of 14,000 persistent, toxic chemicals that are used in countless consumer and industrial products — everything from your waterproof hiking gear to the container for your fast-food burger. They are often called “forever chemicals” because they are extremely persistent and can build up in organisms — including humans — over time.

New Jersey was the first state to regulate certain PFAS in drinking water, with statewide sampling beginning in 2019 on all public water systems. “This was great data because you could see the entire state, all the public drinking water systems, no matter what the size,” Brown says.

Read more at Northeastern Global News.

More Stories

People line up against a border wall as they wait to apply for asylum after crossing the border from Mexico, July 11, 2023, near Yuma, Ariz. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull, File)

Data is clear that immigrants don’t increase crime in the United States, expert says

01.16.2025
A Palestinian boy shouts out to a crowd after the ceasefire.

Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal suggests Biden administration “did not push as hard as they could have” for an end to hostilities, expert says

01.16.2025
A sign reads

What the US exit from the WHO means for global health and pandemic preparedness

01.23.25
All Stories