Skip to content

Legacy admissions are unnecessary, raise moral concerns and exclude deserving students

People in this story

Brick gate at Harvard University.

The Hechinger Report, November 2023

The end of affirmative action has triggered a reconsideration of legacy admissions. When universities extend advantages to the families of donors and alums, they discriminate against others, especially lower-income and Black students. Legacy admissions began to get more attention after the Department of Education initiated a civil rights investigation in July 2023 into Harvard’s legacy practice. That was a good beginning, but donors and alums are also responsible for legacy preferences. Let’s be clear: If it is wrong for universities to give preference to alums and donors, it is wrong for alums and donors to seek those privileges.

When donations to a university are followed by preferential admissions, donors are complicit in the discrimination, inequality and injustice that follow. When donors give with an eye toward future privileges for themselves or for their offspring, they may be engaging in moral licensing: doing good to do bad. Their generosity does not entitle them to advantages that deprive others of opportunities.

Continue reading at The Hechinger Report.

More Stories

Collage of headlines regarding police brutality and unlawful arrests of Black citizens.

New interpretive panel in Newburyport honors city’s Black abolitionists

Graphic for the Dubai 2023 Climate Change conference.

COP28 loss and damage deal both huge victory and huge compromise: expert

Survivors of the 2022 Pakistan floods.

Climate loss-and-damage funding: how to get money to where it’s needed fast

Research Stories