Skip to content
Topics
Stories

Does pro-science messaging increase polarization?

People in this story

At the top of Dr. Hiral Tipirneni’s to-do list if she wins her congressional race: work with other elected officials to encourage mask mandates and to beef up Covid-19 testing and contact tracing. Those choices are backed up by science, said Tipirneni, an emergency room physician running for Arizona’s 6th Congressional District.

On the campaign trail, she has called on her opponent, Rep. David Schweikert (R-Ariz.), to denounce president Donald Trump’s gathering of thousands for a rally in Arizona and his comments about slowing down Covid-19 testing.

“I believe in data; I believe in facts,” Tipirneni told Kaiser Health News. “I believe in science guiding us…whether it’s the opioid crisis or tax policy or immigration reform. Those decisions could be and should be driven by the data. Science is not partisan.”

Tipirneni is one of four Democratic physicians running as challengers for Congress in 2020, all in closely watched races mostly rated as toss-ups. And it’s not just doctors. The group 3.14 Action (named for the value of pi) is working to help elect more scientists to office, promoting on its website candidates such as Mark Kelly, an engineer and former astronaut, who is seeking a Senate seat in Arizona, and Nancy Goroff, who has a doctorate in chemistry and is running for Congress in New York. Science is an integral part of their policy platforms, with an emphasis on the coronavirus pandemic.

These candidates hope to become part of an expanding pro-science caucus that includes three Democratic physician incumbents facing election challenges.

Continue reading at Quartz.

More Stories

Celtics often at epicenter of sports, racial issues in Boston

10.25.2021

Woman arrested in slayings of 4 people in central Michigan

10.21.2021

How the US fails to take away guns from domestic abusers: ‘these deaths are preventable’

10.26.21
In the News