Skip to content
Stories

Triggered Suspicion: How to Minimize Unintended Consequences of Fact-checking

Decorative NULab logo.

Partially supported by a NULab Seedling Grant.

While prior research has extensively tested the effectiveness of fact-checking, the focus has been almost exclusively on the intended outcomes – whether fact-checking reduces beliefs in misconception or intentions to share misinformation (see Walter et al., 2020). However, in the real-life setting, it is also possible fact-checking triggers the public’s suspicion of new information across-the-board, even toward accurate information. Distrust in accurate information is as dangerous, if not more, as trust in false information. 

In this light, the current study examines (a) how fact-checking messages influence individuals’ perception of incoming information and (b) how deception bias, if any, influences people’s attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors. By elucidating long-overlooked but equally important outcomes of fact-checking, this project aims to enhance our understanding of the fact-checking effects and seek ways to limit unintended side effects of fact-checking. 

Principal Investigator

Myojung Chung, Faculty, Journalism

More Stories

word cloud of frequently appearing words in the corpus (aka ‘the canon’) of AI ethics course texts

Analysing AI Ethics… Using AI!

07.01.2025
Network of connecting photographs, documents, and hands

Network and Semantics Analysis of the AI Ethics Field

06.20.2025
Northeastern logo

Community Voices and AI: Exploring Public Perceptions in School Rezoning Efforts

07.07.25
Research Projects