Skip to content
Apply
Stories

Should Clarence Thomas recuse himself in the Colorado case?

People in this story

FILE - Associate Justice Clarence Thomas joins other members of the Supreme Court as they pose for a new group portrait, at the Supreme Court building in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Thomas is acknowledging that he took three trips last year aboard a private plane owned by Republican megadonor Harlan Crow. It’s the first time in years that Thomas has reported receiving hospitality from Crow. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

With the Colorado decision disqualifying former President Donald Trump from running for high office because he allegedly engaged in insurrection likely headed to the Supreme Court, a potential conflict of interest is bubbling. The Colorado Supreme Court ruling said that Trump incited an insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of his supporters attacked the U.S. Capitol and that, therefore, the former president cannot be on the ballot in that state. 

Could Clarence Thomas — whose wife, Ginni, exchanged texts with White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows on Jan. 6 encouraging him to stand firm with Trump as he claimed the election was stolen — preside over the case or should he recuse himself? Northeastern law experts say Thomas should recuse himself but probably won’t.  

Continue reading at Northeastern Global News.

More Stories

Mass deportations are a day one priority for Trump. Economists explain how it could lead to a recession

11.18.2024

Trump’s nomination of Matt Gaetz for attorney general could spill over to the courts, legal scholar says

11.15.2024

Northeastern delegation heads to South Korea for pivotal UN plastic pollution treaty talks

11.21.24
All Stories