Skip to content

Spend no more than 30% on housing? Not necessarily, Northeastern household finance experts say

People in this story

You’ve probably heard the advice — spend no more than 30% of your net income on housing. But while scrolling through Zillow in the midst of a nationwide housing shortage — and a housing “crisis” in major metropolitan areas like Boston and the Bay Area — you might be hard-pressed to find your next home within that parameter.

So, is the 30% allocation on housing relevant anymore?

It is … to a point, says Northeastern University household finance expert Andrés Shahidinejad. “You may want to take into consideration that there’s maybe a certain ‘wisdom of the crowds’ in this focus on 30%,” says Shahidinejad, an assistant professor of finance and economics at Northeastern. “But don’t take it as dogma, either.”

Instead, Shahidinejad advises that we think of the 30%-on-housing advice as less of a rule than as a “rule of thumb.”

Continue reading at Northeastern Global News.

More Stories

If Russia is developing some kind of space-based weapon, Putin may never get to use it. Here’s why.


Minority victims die more often, and at younger ages, from violence. New research explains why “people of color are doubly victimized”


Capital One and Discover merger may be a response to an adjacent concern: the Visa and Mastercard duopoly, economist says

Northeastern Global News